<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vancouver Public Space Network &#187; user fees</title>
	<atom:link href="https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/tag/user-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 16:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>This week at City Council and Park Board: week of March 26, 2012</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2012/03/25/this-week-at-city-council-and-park-board-week-of-march-26-2012/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2012/03/25/this-week-at-city-council-and-park-board-week-of-march-26-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Spaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenspaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance & Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown eastside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food cart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandview-woodland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Landing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marpole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naming policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rezoning application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West End]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=2133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vancouver City Hall &#8211; Photo by Ken Stewart A full slate of meetings at City Council and the Park Board this week – with lots to keep public space aficionados busy. In this edition: Parks &#8211; New Festival, Food Carts,]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;">
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Vancouver City Hall &#8211; Photo by Ken Stewart</em></p>
<p>A full slate of meetings at City Council and the Park Board this week – with lots to keep public space aficionados busy.</p>
<p>In this edition:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Parks &#8211; New Festival, Food Carts, User Fees and Park Naming</strong></li>
<li><strong>Neighbourhood Planning – Grandview-Woodland, Marpole, West End, Downtown Eastside</strong></li>
<li><strong>Elections &amp; Finances – Eight Candidates in Trouble</strong></li>
<li><strong>Riot Review and This Year’s Stanley Cup</strong></li>
<li><strong>Rezonings – Marine Gateway, The Rize, 1<sup>st</sup> &amp; Victoria, Howe &amp; Drake… and others</strong></li>
</ul>
<h4></h4>
<h4><strong>Parks Board &#8211; New Festival, Food Carts, User Fees and Park Naming</strong></h4>
<p>Monday starts with a Parks Board meeting that will consider, among other things, the possibility of a new Sarah McLaughlin led festival in Stanley Park called “<a href="http://vancouver.ca/parks/board/2012/120326/VoicesinthePark.pdf" target="_blank">Voices in the Park</a>,” the expansion of the city’s <a href="http://vancouver.ca/parks/board/2012/120326/FoodVendorBoardReport.pdf" target="_blank">food carts program</a> (with new seasonal carts proposed for a number of parks), a <a href="http://vancouver.ca/parks/board/2012/120326/BudgetBoardReport.pdf" target="_blank">report on user fees and charges</a> (most fees will stay the same, but modest increases are proposed for VanDusen and a few other facilities), and a <a href="http://vancouver.ca/parks/board/2012/120326/ParkNaming.pdf" target="_blank">new policy for naming parks</a>.</p>
<p>The naming policy calls for “more public engagement, more flexibility, and more efficiency” and proposes that park names be evaluated “by considering historical, cultural and geographic elements.”</p>
<h4><strong>Neighbourhood Planning – Grandview-Woodland, Marpole, West End, Downtown Eastside</strong></h4>
<p>The City is about to embark on four new neighbourhood planning exercises. In <a href="http://vancouver.ca/marpole" target="_blank">Marpole</a>, <a href="http://vancouver.ca/gw" target="_blank">Grandview-Woodland</a> and the <a href="http://vancouver.ca/westend" target="_blank">West End</a> the new plans will replace older Local Area plans that date back to the 1970s and 80s. These plans will pull together an array of themes – housing, transportation, parks and public realm, heritage, culture, etc – taking city-wide policy and scaling it down to the neighbourhood level.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://vancouver.ca/dtes" target="_blank">Downtown Eastside</a>, the neighbourhood will be getting a comprehensive plan that looks at neighbourhood change, the social impact of development pressure and opportunity to improve the lives of residents in the area.</p>
<p>The four planning exercises are intended to be broadly collaborative in nature and will feature a number of opportunities for community participation. Reports on these respective planning processes are in front of Council this week in two separate meetings – with the DTES plan on Tuesday’s City <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20120327/documents/cfsc3DowntownEastsideLocalAreaRezoningPolicyandInterimDevelopmentManagementGuidelines.pdf" target="_blank">Finance and Services</a> agenda, and the other three neighbourhoods on deck at Wednesday’s <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20120328/documents/ptec2.pdf" target="_blank">Planning, Transportation and Environment meeting</a>.</p>
<h4><strong>Elections &amp; Finances – Eight Candidates in Trouble</strong></h4>
<p>All candidates who ran for Mayor, Council, Parks Board or School Board were required to file Campaign Finance statements by March 19. Not all of them did – and now stand to get dinged with a $500 fee unless they’re able to apply to the Supreme Court (!) for relief. Most of the eight that are named in the <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20120327/documents/a10.pdf" target="_blank">staff report</a> ran as independents. One of them even won an election debate. The matter will be before Council on Tuesday.</p>
<h4><strong>Riot Review and This Year’s Stanley Cup</strong></h4>
<p>Later on Tuesday, at the City Finance and Services meeting, City Manager Penny Ballem will be giving a <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20120327/cfsc20120327ag.htm" target="_blank">presentation on the Stanley Cup Riot Review</a>, along with an overview of planning for this year’s possible playoff celebrations.</p>
<h4><strong>Rezonings – Marine Gateway, The Rize, 1<sup>st</sup> &amp; Victoria, Howe &amp; Drake… and others</strong></h4>
<p>Monday sees the first of a number of rezoning discussions take place at City Council. Architect James Cheng’s <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20120326/documents/phea3-SR.pdf" target="_blank">Marine Landing proposal</a> (Cambie and SW Marine) is third on the agenda. The proposal calls for a mixed-use development consisting of two towers (31 and 24 storeys respectively) containing market and rental housing, ground-level retail, and two at-grade artists studios. Public realm enhancement along Cambie is part of the discussion. Additional public benefits have been secured through Development Cost Levies ($2m) and for public art (approximately $700K), and further community amenity contribution (CAC) of $5m is included in the proposal.</p>
<p>Later in the week, on Thursday, an earlier <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20120227/phea20120227ag.htm" target="_blank">public hearing is being reconvened</a> to hear input on a number of items, including the proposed rezoning associated with The Rize development at Kingsway and Broadway. The speakers list for this one is l-o-o-n-g and the proposal has become something of a controversy in the neighbourhood. Read our <a href="http://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2012/02/27/this-week-at-city-hall-february-27-march-2-part-i/" target="_blank">earlier post</a> on the subject for more details.</p>
<p>Two other rezoning-related items appear in the docket this week. At Tuesday’s regular Council meeting applications related to proposed developments at East 1<sup>st</sup> &amp; Victoria (supportive housing) and Howe &amp; Drake (a 41-storey tower) will be considered. Council will be reviewing the proposals and deciding whether or not they should be referred to public hearing.</p>
<h4>Get Involved</h4>
<p>To find out how you can register to speak on any of these items, check out the City Clerk&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/mayorcouncil/speaktocouncil.htm" target="_blank">Speaking to Council</a>&#8221; webpage. If you want to present on a Park Board item be sure to visit the <a href="http://vancouver.ca/parks/board/index.htm" target="_blank">Board webpage</a> for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2012/03/25/this-week-at-city-council-and-park-board-week-of-march-26-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fees for block parties?  Not a good idea.</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/03/25/fees-for-block-parties-not-a-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/03/25/fees-for-block-parties-not-a-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[block parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have heard that City Council is contemplating a fee review of film and special events in the City. As part of this, they are considering implementing a $100 charge to community groups for things like block parties and]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You may have heard that City Council is contemplating a <a href="http://internal.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/20100325/csbu20100325ag.htm" target="_blank">fee review of film and special events</a> in the City. As part of this, they are considering implementing a $100 charge to community groups for things like block parties and other activities. While we at the VPSN aren&#8217;t wholly against fees being charged for special events (filming a blockbuster movie on our streets? &#8211; pay up!), we do have issues with local neighbourhood groups being dinged in this fashion.</em></p>
<p><em>Here&#8217;s an excerpt of the letter we sent to Mayor and Council&#8230;</em></p>
<blockquote><p>The Vancouver Public Space Network is <span style="text-decoration:underline;">not</span> in favour of applying a fee to events organized by Community Groups and Not-for-Profits. Community Groups have already been considerably burdened by reduced funding, and while $100 may not seem like much given the scale of corporate events, it is actually a decent sum of money for many local groups. For example, for those that qualified, a fee of this sort would be the equivalent of one fifth of a Vancouver Foundation “small neighbourhood grant”. </p>
<p>In short, we feel the proposed $100 fee is a disincentive for the sort of grassroots, community building activities that many people – yourselves included – are trying to encourage in the city. </p>
<p>The Vancouver Public Space Network would be willing and able to work with City staff on a pro-bono basis to identify ways to streamline the special event process for community and not-for-profit groups. (Your report identifies staff time allocations of approximately 3 hrs/group.)</p>
<p>We recognize that the City is facing considerable challenges; however, we do not feel that using a cost-recovery model of this sort for community groups is a productive way to resolve such difficulties.</p>
<p>If we can be of any assistance with this initiative, please contact us at your convenience.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/03/25/fees-for-block-parties-not-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
