<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vancouver Public Space Network &#187; Cambie</title>
	<atom:link href="https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/tag/cambie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Downtown Bus Service Review &#8211; an opportunity to create new public space in downtown Vancouver</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2014/04/19/downtown-bus-service-review-an-opportunity-to-create-new-public-space-in-downtown-vancouver/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2014/04/19/downtown-bus-service-review-an-opportunity-to-create-new-public-space-in-downtown-vancouver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VPSN]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Spaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedestrian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#5 bus #6 bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[800-block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block 51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downtown Bus Service Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robson Square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Art Gallery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.ca/?p=4306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month, Translink unveiled the latest stage of their review of Vancouver’s downtown bus network. The materials include a set of draft network design concepts &#8212; essentially modified routes for a number of downtown buses. This is particularly important for]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Earlier this month, Translink unveiled the latest stage of their review of Vancouver’s downtown bus network. The materials include a set of draft<a href="http://www.translink.ca/~/media/documents/plans_and_projects/area_transit_plans/downtown_bus_review/dbsr_phase_2_boards_overview.ashx"> network design concepts</a> &#8212; essentially modified routes for a number of downtown buses.</p>
<p dir="ltr">This is particularly important for Vancouver’s public realm, as the route changes also contain options that support at least two major public space initiatives:</p>
<ul>
<li dir="ltr">
<p dir="ltr">The opportunity to expand Robson Square and transform the 800-block of Robson into a pedestrian-only space;</p>
</li>
<li dir="ltr">
<p dir="ltr">the possibility of pedestrianizing the 600-block of Cambie Street (between Dunsmuir and Georgia) as part of the proposed relocation of the Vancouver Art Gallery.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="ltr">Translink is looking for feedback on these concepts, and the <strong>deadline to provide input is this Monday, April 21</strong>. We are strongly encouraging VPSN supporters to take a few moments this weekend to <a href="https://www.talkvancouver.com/R.aspx?a=240" target="_blank">complete the online questionnaire</a>.</p>
<p dir="ltr">If you support the enhancement of Robson Square and pedestrianization of the 800-block and/or the creation of a new plaza at the 600-block of Cambie, this is the time to weigh in.</p>
<h3 dir="ltr"><strong>Good quality public space and transit &#8211; both are needed!</strong></h3>
<p dir="ltr">The VPSN has been following the Bus Service Review closely &#8211; both as fans of public transit, and as advocates for public space. The review is much needed and has been prompted by growth and change in downtown neighbourhoods, the opening of the Canada Line, and the potential to create substantial improvements to the downtown public realm. As noted in Translink’s study materials “over the past twenty years the downtown population has more than doubled.” The Review will help decision-makers plan for transit service that meets the needs of residents and visitors to the downtown peninsula.</p>
<p dir="ltr">We are particularly supportive of proposed changes to the bus routes that would enable the expansion of Robson Square. The Review has identified short-term changes to support the summertime activation of the 800-block, but it also looks at potential changes to support the permanent pedestrianization of Vancouver’s pre-eminent public gathering area. The idea of creating an expanded public square around the 800-block has been discussed since the 1950s. The Bus Service Review options have the potential to enable the City to take a strong step forward on this initiative.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Figuring out what to do with transit &#8211; and ensuring good bus service for West End residents &#8211; has been the key sticking point in expanding Robson Square. Suffice it to say, we are excited to see the kinds of workable solutions the City and TransLink’s review process has yielded. The Review shows that it’s possible to have better transit connections and create a more vibrant public realm.</p>
<h3 dir="ltr"><strong>What’s in the Review?</strong></h3>
<p dir="ltr">As part of the review, Translink has identified various ways that bus service in and around downtown Vancouver can be enhanced. These are explored in options that relate to three areas of potential change:</p>
<ol>
<li>Downtown-only Routes (Buses 5, 6, C21, C23)</li>
<li>Cambie Bridge Routes (Bus 17)</li>
<li>Eastern Corridor Routes (Buses 3, 4, 7, 8, 19, 209, 210, 211, 214)</li>
</ol>
<p dir="ltr">It’s worth taking a look at all of these possible areas of change, and you can do this by looking at both general and technical documents that Translink has produced. The online survey also provides much of this background information.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Our particular area of focus is on the first of these three areas of change, as it most directly relates to the possibility of expanding Robson Square.</p>
<h3 dir="ltr"><strong>Two overarching options for Downtown-only Routes… with important variations</strong></h3>
<p dir="ltr">The Local Bus Review identifies two potential options in redesigning the bus routes that stay within the downtown Vancouver peninsula. These are referred to as the<strong> L-shaped Loop (option A1)</strong>, or the <strong>Rectangular Loop (option A2)</strong>. In their basic form, both of these options show bus service remaining on the 800-block of Robson, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">but,</span> both proposals also include <span style="text-decoration: underline;">alternate routings</span> that would facilitate the expansion of Robson Square</strong>, and the creation of a pedestrian-only space on the 800-block.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Here’s option A1 &#8211; the <strong>“L-shaped Loop”</strong>, with the Robson-closure ‘sub-option’ below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Concept A1 w Robson Closure - Detail by Vancouver Public Space Network (VPSN), on Flickr" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/vancouverpublicspace/13745799323"><img class="aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black;" alt="Concept A1 w Robson Closure - Detail" src="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3666/13745799323_6f5581cb83.jpg" width="354" height="450" /></a></p>
<p dir="ltr">In this case the Robson Square variant routes the #5 north on Burrard (at Robson) and then east on Hastings and over to Cambie. With this route, the bus swings by Waterfront Station (or close to it). Its southbound route (along Cambie) then brings it in close proximity to key cultural services such as the library. The L-shaped Loop option also has a second ‘sub-option’ (not shown here) that accommodates the closure and pedestrianization of the 600-block of Cambie, but not the 800-block of Robson.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Here’s option A2 &#8211; the &#8220;<strong>Rectangular Loop</strong>,&#8221; again with the Robson-closure sub-option:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Concept A2 w Robson Closure - Detail by Vancouver Public Space Network (VPSN), on Flickr" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/vancouverpublicspace/13745794083"><img class="aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid black;" alt="Concept A2 w Robson Closure - Detail" src="https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7309/13745794083_d65076a772.jpg" width="352" height="450" /></a></p>
<p dir="ltr">On the Robson Square variant of A2, the #5 bus turns north on Burrard to Georgia, and then over to Cambie &#8211; a route that would take the bus directly by both Canada Line and SkyTrain stations (at Granville), the VPL Central Library and other other key amenities and services &#8211; including the potential new home of the Art Gallery.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Again, it’s important to note that while both the basic A1 and A2 options offer interesting transit-focused improvements, neither support the expansion of public space at Robson or Cambie on their own. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">It’s the the various sub-options to A1 and A2 where these important enhancements are made</span>.</strong></p>
<p dir="ltr">Help support the creation of improved public space in downtown Vancouver. If you support the enhancement of Robson Square and pedestrianization of the 800-block and/or the creation of a new plaza at the 600-block of Cambie, this is the time to weigh in and share your thoughts on these proposed changes to the bus network.</p>
<h3 dir="ltr"><strong>How to have your say</strong></h3>
<p dir="ltr">The deadline for input is Monday, April 21. The <a href="https://www.talkvancouver.com/R.aspx?a=240" target="_blank">online questionnaire can be accessed here</a>, or by pasting the following link into your browser:</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="https://www.talkvancouver.com/R.aspx?a=240">https://www.talkvancouver.com/R.aspx?a=240</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">You can share your thoughts on the downtown-only routes, as well as the Cambie Bridge and Eastern Corridor routes. (The survey allows you to pick which of the three areas you want to talk about).</p>
<p dir="ltr">As noted above, much of the background information on the Downtown Bus Service Review can be found on the survey website; however if you feel like reading more there’s also an interesting <a href="http://www.translink.ca/~/media/documents/plans_and_projects/area_transit_plans/downtown_bus_review/dbsr_phase_2_open_house_boards.ashx" target="_blank">backgrounder </a>and <a href="http://www.translink.ca/~/media/documents/plans_and_projects/area_transit_plans/downtown_bus_review/dbsr_phase_2_technical_summary.ashx" target="_blank">technical paper</a> that offers more details on the pros and cons of different route options.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Please do take a few moments to share your thoughts. This is a key opportunity for downtown public space, and your opinion is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2014/04/19/downtown-bus-service-review-an-opportunity-to-create-new-public-space-in-downtown-vancouver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VPSN supports additional investment in cycling infrastructure</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2013/06/11/vpsn-supports-additional-investment-in-cycling-infrastructure/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2013/06/11/vpsn-supports-additional-investment-in-cycling-infrastructure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 05:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedestrian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adanac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike lanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=2782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier improvements to the Adanac Bikeway On Wednesday, City Council will be deliberating over a staff report on three &#8216;active transportation corridor&#8217; improvements: Union Street (Gore Street to Carrall Street) Cambie Bridge (north end to Beatty Street) Canada Line (pedestrian]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;">
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Earlier improvements to the Adanac Bikeway</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em></em>On Wednesday, City Council will be deliberating over a <a href="http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20130612/documents/cfsc2.pdf" target="_blank">staff report</a> on three &#8216;active transportation corridor&#8217; improvements:</p>
<ul>
<li>Union Street (Gore Street to Carrall Street)</li>
<li>Cambie Bridge (north end to Beatty Street)</li>
<li>Canada Line (pedestrian and bicycle connection)</li>
</ul>
<p>The VPSN has written a letter of support, an excerpt of which can be found below:</p>
<blockquote><p>We are writing to you to express our support in principle for the proposed upgrades to the Union Street as a part of the Adanac Bikeway. The Adanac Bikeway acts as a type of bicycle artery offering a safe connection appropriate for cyclists of all ages and abilities with relatively little interaction with motor vehicles into the Downtown Peninsula and False Creek from East Vancouver and beyond. However, as it is currently configured, the area on Union Street West of Gore is far less inviting to the cyclist and has a number of potential areas of conflict between cyclists and motorists. Reducing these areas of conflict and creating a more legible streetscape in this relatively small section of a much larger system should be a priority.</p>
<p>Although it would be our preference for the 200 block of Union Street to become one way to vehicles to allow for two separated bicycle lanes as originally proposed, we are willing to support the concept of the shared eastbound lane on a trial basis in order to help alleviate the concerns expressed by some of businesses in the 200 block of Union Street. Given that this intersection is considerably influenced by the viaducts, it would be our suggestion that the shared lane be on a trial basis until a decision has been made regarding the future of the viaducts, at which point it could be reviewed.</p>
<p>Some businesses have voiced their concern over the removal of on-street parking on Union Street as well as the change in traffic patterns. The perception that the installation of bicycle infrastructure creates negative impacts on local businesses has been frequently shown to be inaccurate. For example, a 2009 study in Toronto found that the removal of on-street parking in favour of a bike lane would have few negative effects on businesses and that they may actually benefit from lane re-allocation. In fact, it was determined that only 10% of those businesses’ patrons drove and that those that arrived by foot and bicycle visited more often and spent the most money per month.</p>
<p>Alleviating the fears of businesses will be crucial for the continued success of the Adanac Bikeway and other bicycle infrastructure throughout the City. In addition to the works on the Adanac Bikeway, we are also in support of the proposed Cambie Bridge to Beatty and Canada Line connections which we believe will help to increase bicycle and pedestrian use while improving conditions for transit users, pedestrians and cyclists.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2013/06/11/vpsn-supports-additional-investment-in-cycling-infrastructure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on relocating the VAG &#8211; and discussions on a new public plaza</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/13/update-on-relocating-the-vag-and-discussions-on-a-new-public-plaza/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/13/update-on-relocating-the-vag-and-discussions-on-a-new-public-plaza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunsmuir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larwill Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Art Gallery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following media announcement just came in to VPSN headquarters &#8211; and provides some coverage and commentary on the possible relocation of the Vancouver Art Gallery to the old Larwill Park site (currently the big parking lot at Dunsmuir and Cambie).]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following media announcement just came in to VPSN headquarters &#8211; and provides some coverage and commentary on the possible relocation of the Vancouver Art Gallery to the old Larwill Park site (currently the big parking lot at Dunsmuir and Cambie). We <a href="http://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/03/15/the-art-gallery-two-step-the-dream-of-a-cultural-precinct-returns-to-larwill-park/" target="_blank">explored the issues</a> around this a few times last year, and it&#8217;s interesting to see how things are moving forward. At a quick first read it looks as if the VAG has been given a couple of years to make the case for the Larwill Park site, secure funding and conduct a more inclusive and robust engagement process.</p>
<p>A report on the subject will be in front of Council next week and can be viewed <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20110120/documents/csbu3.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>As part of the proposal, there&#8217;s also discussion around the potential to create new public space(s) around the gallery, including a public plaza and the possible closure of Cambie Street between Georgia and Dunsmuir. Exciting stuff that, in our mind, builds upon the work that&#8217;s been done on the expansion of Robson Square.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be reviewing the report and making further comment shortly. In the meanwhile, here&#8217;s the City&#8217;s press release:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Report proposing downtown cultural hub, possible Vancouver Art Gallery relocation, public plaza coming to council</strong></p>
<p>A staff report coming to Vancouver city council next week proposes setting aside two acres of 688 Cambie Street (the former Greyhound Bus depot and Olympic Downtown Live Site) for the development of a cultural hub and public plaza, which could include the relocation and expansion of the Vancouver Art Gallery.</p>
<p>“The exciting thing about this proposal is that it’s not just about the potential for a new cultural space, but also about the design and use of public space downtown,” said Mayor Gregor Robertson. “This site was the home for the Olympic Downtown Live Site and Four Host First Nations, and we want to create a lasting cultural and economic legacy from the success we saw during the Games.</p>
<p>“We have an opportunity to create a hub of cultural and economic activity in a unique and evolving part of downtown, while also developing a new space for the public to enjoy. That could include a new public plaza and even a possible closure of part of Cambie Street, which would create a vibrant public space as an Olympic legacy.</p>
<p>“These ideas will all be discussed as part of the consultations we’ll be kicking off, and I look forward to hearing from the public about them.”</p>
<p>The report, which will go to council Thursday January 20, recommends that the City reserve two acres of 688 Cambie for up to two years for cultural use. During this time, city staff would work with the Vancouver Art Gallery to develop a strategy that meets the future needs of both the Gallery and the City. The City would commit two acres of the lot at 688 Cambie, which is currently a surface parking lot, for a new Gallery if the VAG can develop a rigorous business plan, demonstrate broad support from the cultural community and the public, and provide evidence of its ability to successfully raise the required capital and operating costs.</p>
<p>The report to council proposes examining the potential for a public plaza fronting on Georgia Street, which would create continuity between the Queen Elizabeth Theatre Plaza and 688 Cambie. There will also be discussions with other cultural groups like the Vancouver Concert Hall and Theatre Society, who have expressed interest in using the site for a concert hall and theatre.</p>
<p>The City will also undertake an extensive community consultation and public input process from the cultural community and general public on the Gallery and the use of the site at 688 Cambie.<br />
“This proposal is a very positive step forward,” said Mayor Gregor Robertson. “The VAG is one of the most important cultural institutions in our city and it has made a compelling case for expansion and relocation. I want to recognize the patience and dedication the VAG has shown over these past few years – it has been a long process to arrive at this juncture but we now have a framework to move forward.</p>
<p>“This council has been a strong supporter of arts and culture – we did not make a single budget cut to the arts last year. We have a world-class arts and culture scene in Vancouver and we’re going to do everything we can to take it to the next level.”</p>
<p>The council report can be viewed <a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20110120/documents/csbu3.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/13/update-on-relocating-the-vag-and-discussions-on-a-new-public-plaza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
