<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vancouver Public Space Network &#187; building height</title>
	<atom:link href="https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/tag/building-height/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 17:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Feature Event &#8211; Tall Buildings and Sustainable Design &#8211; Tonight</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2012/04/10/feature-event-tall-buildings-and-sustainable-design-tonight/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2012/04/10/feature-event-tall-buildings-and-sustainable-design-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bjarke Ingels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building height]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historic area height review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howe Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view cones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=2163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed development at 1400 Howe. Architect: Bjarke Ingels There&#8217;s an interesting lecture taking place this evening at SFU Harbour Centre &#8211; on the subject of tall buildings. This is a topic that gets both advocates and detractors passionate&#8230; and tonight&#8217;s]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;">
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Proposed development at 1400 Howe. Architect: Bjarke Ingels</em></p>
<p>There&#8217;s an interesting lecture taking place this evening at SFU Harbour Centre &#8211; on the subject of tall buildings. This is a topic that gets both advocates and detractors passionate&#8230; and tonight&#8217;s event promises to be a good discussion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sponsored by the City of Vancouver&#8217;s Urban Design Panel. Here&#8217;s the official word, courtesy of a press release that was sent out yesterday:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Renowned architects participate in lecture and Urban Design Panel review of proposed highrise</strong></p>
<p>Internationally recognized architects will discuss tall buildings and sustainable design at a public lecture and participate the next day in a special session of the Urban Design Panel to share their knowledge and expertise.</p>
<p>The free public lecture will feature architects Stefan Behnisch (Stuttgart) and Peter Clewes (Toronto) who will speak about their work and observations on sustainability and architectural excellence, particularly as they relate to taller buildings.</p>
<p>When: Tuesday, April 10 from 7:30 to 9:30 p.m.<br />
Where: SFU Harbour Centre, 515 West Hastings Street, 1400 Segal Room</p>
<p>Behnisch and Clewes will then join Vancouver architects Walter Francl and Mark Ostry and members of Vancouver’s Urban Design Panel for a technical review of a proposed highrise development at 1400 Howe Street at a special session of the panel.</p>
<p>The panel provides recommendations to Vancouver City Council and City staff on creating buildings that achieve the highest standards for sustainability and architectural excellence.</p>
<p>In 2011, Council approved a revised policy for high building proposals. Proposed buildings that significantly exceed existing height limits are subject to an enhanced review process which includes the addition of world-renowned architects to the Urban Design Panel.</p>
<p>The City continually reviews the design of tall buildings and their impact on the city skyline and designated public views, while considering development opportunities that advance sustainable design.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2012/04/10/feature-event-tall-buildings-and-sustainable-design-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>View corridors, higher buildings in Downtown and Heritage Areas under review</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/17/view-corridors-higher-buildings-in-downtown-and-heritage-areas-to-be-considered/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/17/view-corridors-higher-buildings-in-downtown-and-heritage-areas-to-be-considered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building height]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historic area height review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view cones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view corridors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concept drawing: Higher buildings at the Granville gateway On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Vancouver City Council will be reviewing two staff reports on the inter-related subjects of downtown and heritage area building heights and view corridors. Tonight, Monday, January 17,]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;">
<div id="NewsPostDetailSummary">
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Concept drawing: Higher buildings at the Granville gateway</em></p>
<p>On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Vancouver City Council will be reviewing two staff reports on the inter-related subjects of downtown and heritage area building heights and view corridors. Tonight, Monday, January 17, the Planning Department staff are holding a public meeting and Q&amp;A session on the subject.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>7:00 &#8211; 8:30 pm</strong><br />
<strong>Empire Landmark Hotel (1400 Robson Street)</strong><br />
<strong>Crystal Ballroom (lobby level)</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>The first report – <em><a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20110120/documents/penv5.pdf" target="_blank">Implementation of “Vancouver Views” and Opportunities for Higher Buildings in the Downtown</a> </em>– recommends that Council formally adopt the changes to the view protection guidelines that were approved in principle in January 2010 (adding three new view corridors and affirming the 27 already in existence). It also recommends that Council adopt a revised General Policy For Higher Buildings, which would allow consideration of higher buildings <em>outside</em> all but one of the protected public views in the Downtown area. </p>
<p>The second report – <em><a href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20110120/documents/penv4.pdf" target="_blank">Historic Area Height Review Policy Implementation</a> </em>– looks at height issues in portions of Gastown, Chinatown, Victory Square and Main and Hastings. It recommends that Council support the rezoning of portions of Chinatown to allow for the creation of mid-rise development upwards of 120 feet in Chinatown South and Hastings and Main, as well as the creation of limited opportunities for larger buildings up to 150 feet. The report notes that any rezoning undertaken in the Historic Area would need to comply with the protected view corridors.</p>
<p>The VPSN has written an <a href="http://vancouverpublicspace.ca/uploads/IssueNote_VancouverViews.pdf">Issues Note</a> (PDF) on the subject that outlines some of the history of Vancouver&#8217;s view corridors policy, considerations around public benefits, and a synopsis of what&#8217;s at stake in the two reports currently being contemplated. There&#8217;s an array of commentary already in circulation and we&#8217;ve attempted to distill some of the key points down to a useful synopsis.</p>
<p>Among the many things for people to think about with these issues:</p>
</div>
<div id="NewsPostDetailContent">
<ul>
<li>Currently, taller buildings are utilized by planners as one way to generate needed public benefits or economic revitalization. Where do you stand on this trade-off? Are there other ways to achieve the benefits associated with higher buildings?</li>
<li>Would the city’s key gateway areas – Granville and Burrard &#8211; benefit from stronger sense of architectural definition? Would higher buildings in these areas help with this?</li>
<li>While iconic architecture can contribute to a sense of place, care must still be taken in evaluating a buildings’ impact on their immediate vicinity (e.g. street fronts, shading, pedestrian flows, etc.) If these impacts can be reasonably accommodated are higher buildings acceptable?</li>
<li>Where do you stand on view corridors? Vancouver’s ‘view culture’ has shaped the actual urban form of the city, but is there a point in which a focus on distant, however beautiful views, sacrifices ‘in the city’ benefits and architectural/urban design opportunities?</li>
<li>How high is too high? Are there social and health related considerations that should be taken into account with the creation of higher buildings? For example, one body of literature suggests that buildings over a certain height cause a disconnect between the home and the street and that this, in turn contributes to socio-spatial problems in neighbourhoods with lots of high rises. Another body of literature notes that increased density (characteristic of downtown residential development) increases walkability and can foster social capital. How might this development affect quality of life issues?</li>
</ul>
<p>:: Downoad Issue Note &#8211; <a href="http://vancouverpublicspace.ca/uploads/IssueNote_VancouverViews.pdf">Vancouver Views, Downtown &amp; Historic Area Height Considerations</a> (PDF)</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/17/view-corridors-higher-buildings-in-downtown-and-heritage-areas-to-be-considered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City holds Q&amp;A on view corridors, building heights</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/14/city-holds-qa-on-view-corridors-building-heights/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/14/city-holds-qa-on-view-corridors-building-heights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building height]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historic area height review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view corridors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More on the issue of building heights and view corridors. The City will be holding a Q&#38;A session on Monday, in advance of the Council presentation on Thursday. Here&#8217;s the media release on the subject: Public information meeting on downtown]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on the issue of building heights and view corridors. The City will be holding a Q&amp;A session on Monday, in advance of the Council presentation on Thursday.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the media release on the subject:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Public information meeting on downtown building heights</strong></p>
<p>The City of Vancouver is holding a public information meeting to provide details on two reports concerning downtown building heights that will be considered by City Council next week. The public meeting will be held on:</p>
<p>Monday, January 17 from 7 &#8211; 8:30 pm<br />
(Presentation starts at 7 pm, followed by a question and answer session)<br />
Empire Landmark Hotel<br />
1400 Robson Street, Crystal Ballroom, Lobby Level</p>
<p>At the meeting, City staff will review the specifics of the Vancouver Views report, which protects public view corridors and looks at opportunities for limited higher buildings downtown that do not intrude into public view corridors.</p>
<p>Staff will also present information on the Historic Area Height Review report which implements Council&#8217;s decisions on building heights in specific areas of Gastown, Chinatown, Victory Square, and the Hastings and Main Street area.</p>
<p>City Council will consider the recommendations in the two reports at a Council meeting on January 20, which is open to the public.</p>
<p>More information on these reports is available online at vancouver.ca/views and vancouver.ca/hahr</p>
<p>Media contact:<br />
Corporate Communications<br />
604.871.6336<br />
<a href="mailto:media@vancouver.ca">media@vancouver.ca</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/14/city-holds-qa-on-view-corridors-building-heights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On-line voting in Vancouver &#8211; worth casting a ballot for?</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/13/on-line-voting-in-vancouver-worth-casting-a-ballot-for/</link>
		<comments>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/13/on-line-voting-in-vancouver-worth-casting-a-ballot-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vancouverpublicspace]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Spaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenspaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building height]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenest City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view corridors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I voted&#8221; sticker &#8211; Photo by Cave Canem Next week promises to be a busy one at Council &#8211; between the regular session of Council on Tuesday and the various Council Committee meetings taking place on Thursday there is a]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;">
<p><em> &#8220;I voted&#8221; sticker &#8211; Photo by Cave Canem</em></p>
<p>Next week promises to be a busy one at Council &#8211; between the regular session of Council on Tuesday and the various Council Committee meetings taking place on Thursday there is a full suite of public space related activities. These include:</p>
<ul>
<li>A motion (see below) on the possibility of on-line voting (Tues)</li>
<li>A motion on calculating available density in the city (Tues)</li>
<li>A report on expanding street food options (Thurs)</li>
<li>A report on noise in the city and the efficacy of the noise bylaw (Thurs)</li>
<li>Discussion on the VAG move (which we mentioned in our <a href="http://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/13/update-on-relocating-the-vag-and-discussions-on-a-new-public-plaza/" target="_blank">previous post</a>) (Thurs)</li>
<li>Two presentations &#8211; likely quite contentious &#8211; on building heights and view-related issues (Thurs)</li>
<li>The draft Greenest City Implementation Plan (Thurs)</li>
</ul>
<p>The first is particularly timely. Earlier this week a suite of contenders for the leadership of the <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-liberal-hopefuls-show-general-support-for-online-vote/article1868109/" target="_blank">BC liberals endorsed (some cautiously) the idea of on-line voting</a>. And here&#8217;s a chance to consider it at the local level.</p>
<p>For those that have difficulty scheduling a trip to the neighbourhood voting box once every three or four years, this might make life easier. There&#8217;s a larger discussion to be had about civic engagement here &#8211; and, as much as we like technology, we can&#8217;t help wonder if this will do much to get at the core issues behind current voting levels. Then again, if it does a better job of getting residents engaged with the civic contest, that&#8217;s a positive outcome.</p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s an interesting motion and we&#8217;re be watching to see the sort of exchange that ensues.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the text of the motion, which was introduced by Councillor Andrea Reimer:<br />
<span id="more-801"></span><br />
WHEREAS</p>
<p>1. Less than 35% of eligible voters in Vancouver cast ballots in the last two<br />
civic elections;</p>
<p>2. Voter turnout is considered an important indicator of social cohesion<br />
and vital to a healthy democracy;</p>
<p>3. Research conducted by Elections Canada on voter turn out in the last<br />
federal election found that 57% of non-voters cited time pressures that<br />
prevented them from getting to a voting place in person;</p>
<p>4. Elections Canada will be conducting an online voting pilot in the 2013<br />
federal election;</p>
<p>5. Online voting can greatly improve accessibility by increasing the time<br />
and place options available to voters to cast a ballot;</p>
<p>6. Online voting is used in more than three dozen Canadian municipalities ranging from 44 municipalities in Ontario, such as Markham, ON which piloted online voting in 2003, to Halifax, Nova Scotia which conducted successful pilots in a 2008 general election and 2009 by-election;</p>
<p>THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Clerk report to Council on the feasibility of conducting an online voting pilot in the 2011 municipal elections or, if 2011 is not feasible, what the earliest date for a pilot would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2011/01/13/on-line-voting-in-vancouver-worth-casting-a-ballot-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
