<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Projection billboards: Oakridge ad violates Sign Bylaw</title>
	<atom:link href="https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/12/18/projection-billboards-oakridge-ad-violates-sign-bylaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/12/18/projection-billboards-oakridge-ad-violates-sign-bylaw/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VPSN</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/12/18/projection-billboards-oakridge-ad-violates-sign-bylaw/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VPSN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=777#comment-98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interestingly, there is no loophole.  City bylaws are fairly explicit about the fact that these sorts of projection technologies &#039;count&#039; as signs and are thus subject to the same regulatory considerations.

While we agree that the fact that these ones are impermanent means that their material impact may be different than an old school frame and panel billboard, there are other considerations to think about as well... such as visual impact of larger advertising in public space, the placement of these ads (which often contravene Sign Bylaw requirements), the lack of permitting, the distraction factor with projecting large movie-style ads beside a major roadway, and so on.

But the notion of whether or not they might be better than the older type of billboards is an interesting question and one that we&#039;re looking at with our work into outdoor advertising.  Hopefully we can keep you involved in the discussion as it carries on!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, there is no loophole.  City bylaws are fairly explicit about the fact that these sorts of projection technologies &#8216;count&#8217; as signs and are thus subject to the same regulatory considerations.</p>
<p>While we agree that the fact that these ones are impermanent means that their material impact may be different than an old school frame and panel billboard, there are other considerations to think about as well&#8230; such as visual impact of larger advertising in public space, the placement of these ads (which often contravene Sign Bylaw requirements), the lack of permitting, the distraction factor with projecting large movie-style ads beside a major roadway, and so on.</p>
<p>But the notion of whether or not they might be better than the older type of billboards is an interesting question and one that we&#8217;re looking at with our work into outdoor advertising.  Hopefully we can keep you involved in the discussion as it carries on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cw</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/12/18/projection-billboards-oakridge-ad-violates-sign-bylaw/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=777#comment-97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with AD.. this is a much better way to advertise and we cant avoid advertising.. Print billboards do nothing but fill landfills monthly. At least these companies seem to be considering their impact.. This compared to that building with a huge Vinyl ad hanging off.. I prefer this.. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with AD.. this is a much better way to advertise and we cant avoid advertising.. Print billboards do nothing but fill landfills monthly. At least these companies seem to be considering their impact.. This compared to that building with a huge Vinyl ad hanging off.. I prefer this.. <img src="https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/dev/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/12/18/projection-billboards-oakridge-ad-violates-sign-bylaw/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=777#comment-96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually prefer these projections to regular billboards.  Techniques like pressure washing sidewalks or video projection have way less impact on the environment than repeatedly printing billboard ads on vinyl or paper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually prefer these projections to regular billboards.  Techniques like pressure washing sidewalks or video projection have way less impact on the environment than repeatedly printing billboard ads on vinyl or paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/2010/12/18/projection-billboards-oakridge-ad-violates-sign-bylaw/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublicspace.wordpress.com/?p=777#comment-95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These projection ads sometimes go on the Scotiabank Theatre on Burrard and a building on Granville.  They make me so angry.    Unfortunately I don&#039;t think the current bylaw covers them - and they aren&#039;t in place long enough for any enforcement to take place anyway.   It seems like they&#039;ve found a pretty solid loophole...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These projection ads sometimes go on the Scotiabank Theatre on Burrard and a building on Granville.  They make me so angry.    Unfortunately I don&#8217;t think the current bylaw covers them &#8211; and they aren&#8217;t in place long enough for any enforcement to take place anyway.   It seems like they&#8217;ve found a pretty solid loophole&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
